12 Aug
2009
12 Aug
'09
1:13 p.m.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 08:34:28AM -0500, Derek Elkins wrote:
As was just pointed out in the unsafeDestructiveAssign thread from which this thread was forked, effects are incompatible with non-strict evaluation.
No, they aren't. At least, they aren't in any technical way. There have been more than a few languages supporting both laziness and mutation starting with Algol.
But laziness is just one way of implementing non-strictness, right? What about others methods? -- Felipe.