
ghc including ghci does not know about sandboxes. At all. That is what cabal/stack exec is for; it runs a command inside the sandbox. There are sandboxing mechanisms that don't require this, but they require your shell dotfiles to be set up in a way almost nobody does these days (proper separation of environment variables; otherwise you get things like the sandbox's package database, but the wrong $PATH). hsenv used to work that way. On Friday, August 4, 2017, Emil Axelsson <78emil@gmail.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','78emil@gmail.com');> wrote:
Thanks for your reply! But I actually don't want `cabal repl`. The bigger picture is explained here:
http://fun-discoveries.blogspot.com/2017/08/building-haskell -projects-with-ghc.html
Towards the end of that post I suggest using `cabal exec` to integrate with a Cabal sandbox; however, as Daniel Trstenjak pointed out, that shouldn't be needed since `cabal-cargs` already sets the `-package-db` flag for GHC.
So my question is why `cabal exec` is needed (in this particular case) even though `-package-db` is given?
I know `cabal exec` sets a few environment variables (`CABAL_SANDBOX_CONFIG`, `CABAL_SANDBOX_PACKAGE_PATH` and `GHC_PACKAGE_PATH`). I've checked that these are all set correctly, so Cabal seems to be doing its job. But it's not clear why ghci gets confused when these variables are not set (and `-package-db` is given), but not when the variables are set.
Cheers
/ Emil
Den 2017-08-04 kl. 15:31, skrev nek0:
Hi Emil,
What you want is hidden behind the `cabal repl` command, which starts ghci with the package-db of the sandbox.
Greetings,
nek0
On 4.8.2017 13:41, Emil Axelsson wrote:
Hi!
I have a small file Test.hs alone in a directory:
{-# LANGUAGE DeriveGeneric #-}
module Test where
import Data.Hashable import Data.Scientific import GHC.Generics
data Sc = Sc Scientific deriving (Generic)
instance Hashable Sc
To be able to load this file, I set up a Cabal sandbox:
$ ghc --numeric-version 8.0.2
$ cabal --numeric-version 1.24.0.2
$ cabal sandbox init ...
$ cabal install hashable-1.2.6.0 scientific ...
(Note: not the latest version of hashable.)
Now, if I try to run GHCi and point it to the sandbox' package database I get this error:
$ ghci -package-db=.cabal-sandbox/x86_64-linux-ghc-8.0.2-packages.conf.d Test.hs GHCi, version 8.0.2: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ :? for help [1 of 1] Compiling Test ( Test.hs, interpreted )
Test.hs:12:14: error: • No instance for (Hashable Scientific) arising from a use of ‘hashable-1.2.6.1:Data.Hashable.Class.$dmhashWithSalt’ • In the expression: hashable-1.2.6.1:Data.Hashable.Class.$dmhashWithSalt @Sc In an equation for ‘hashWithSalt’: hashWithSalt = hashable-1.2.6.1:Data.Hashable.Class.$dmhashWithSalt @Sc In the instance declaration for ‘Hashable Sc’
Somehow it mixes in version 1.2.6.1 of hashable, even though this package isn't installed (neither in the sandbox nor the global database).
It turns out that wrapping the command in `cabal exec` fixes the problem:
$ cabal exec -- ghci -package-db=.cabal-sandbox/x86_64-linux-ghc-8.0.2-packages.conf.d Test.hs GHCi, version 8.0.2: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ :? for help [1 of 1] Compiling Test ( Test.hs, interpreted ) Ok, modules loaded: Test. *Test>
Any idea what's going on?
/ Emil _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to: http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to: http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.
-- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allbery.b@gmail.com ballbery@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net