On 10.07.2013 10:16, Ertugrul Söylemez wrote:
oleg@okmij.org wrote:
Hear, hear! In OCaml, I can (and often do) write
let (x,s) = foo 1 [] in let (y,s) = bar x s in let (z,s) = baz x y s in ...
In Haskell I'll have to uniquely number the s's:
let (x,s1) = foo 1 [] in let (y,s2) = bar x s1 in let (z,s3) = baz x y s2 in ...
This isn't a case for non-recursive let. It is one of the rare cases where you might actually consider using a state monad.
Except when you are implementing the state monad (giggle): http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/mtl/2.1/doc/html/src/Control-Mon... -- Andreas Abel <>< Du bist der geliebte Mensch. Theoretical Computer Science, University of Munich Oettingenstr. 67, D-80538 Munich, GERMANY andreas.abel@ifi.lmu.de http://www2.tcs.ifi.lmu.de/~abel/