This is most likely attributable to the use of different compilers.
I don't see how accepting such a variant can cause ambiguity, but I'm
not quite sure whether it is legal H98.
On 5/6/09, Magnus Therning
Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
On May 6, 2009, at 12:18 , Nico Rolle wrote:
why does this don't work?
test = let a = (>) in 1 `a` 2
Works fine here once I correct your indentation (the "in" needs to be indented at least as far as the "l" in "let").
Really? For me it's enough to have "in" indented more then "test", and one space is enough:
test = let a = (>) in 1 `a` 2
/M
-- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) magnus＠therning．org Jabber: magnus＠therning．org http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe