10 Jul
2013
10 Jul
'13
4:16 a.m.
oleg@okmij.org wrote:
Hear, hear! In OCaml, I can (and often do) write
let (x,s) = foo 1 [] in let (y,s) = bar x s in let (z,s) = baz x y s in ...
In Haskell I'll have to uniquely number the s's:
let (x,s1) = foo 1 [] in let (y,s2) = bar x s1 in let (z,s3) = baz x y s2 in ...
This isn't a case for non-recursive let. It is one of the rare cases where you might actually consider using a state monad. Greets, Ertugrul -- Not to be or to be and (not to be or to be and (not to be or to be and (not to be or to be and ... that is the list monad.