FriendlyARM modules look very good.
If you are interested in compute performance on a pocket budget, e.g.
for computer vision on this RC plane, you could try 8-core Merrii A80
(http://linux-sunxi.org/Merrii_A80_Optimus_Board) or Pcduino8
(http://www.pcduino.com/pcduino8-beta-available-application/) or
Cubieboard A80. There is some preliminary Linux support.
You could even test-drive Parallel Haskell on those :)
These A80 boards draw 3 Amps of current at 5 Volts which is doable for
a standard LiPo battery. This current draw is considerably less than
that required by the motor anyway. Boards should work from a battery
source regulated by a 5V voltage regulator.
Yet I wonder why do you have a requirement to run code in the
interpreter on an automnomous vehicle? Wouldn't compiled code run more
efficiently and require less resources?
--Vladimir
On 16 February 2015 at 09:46, Karel Gardas
On 02/16/15 10:39 AM, Karel Gardas wrote:
If you insist on GHCi, then search for Cortex-Ax which is able to run Linux and which fulfill your weight reqs. For example Gumstick or Variscite makes a lot of nice SOMs, perhaps some of them is applicable for your app?
Also have a look at http://www.friendlyarm.net/ -- their TinyXXXX modules are really close to what you proposed in PyBoard and still able to run Linux + GHCi.
Karel
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe