I meant, of course, g = let otherwise = not in otherwise Sorry for the noise. -- Kim-Ee Kim-Ee Yeoh wrote:
Hi Vasili,
This isn't really a shadowing/redefinition issue. Here's a perfectly legitimate snippet that compiles fine:
f 0 = 0 f otherwise = 1+otherwise
Redefinition is when you have:
g = let otherwise = not in x
-- Kim-Ee
VasiliIGalchin wrote:
swishParse :: String -> String -> SwishStateIO (Maybe RDFGraph) swishParse fnam inp = do { fmt <- gets $ format ; case fmt of N3 -> swishParseN3 fnam inp otherwise -> do { swishError ("Unsupported file format: "++(show fmt)) 4 ; return Nothing } }
I am receiving a shadow warning:
Swish/HaskellRDF/SwishCommands.hs:304:12: Warning: Defined but not used: `otherwise'
It seems to me that in the code base somewhere that there is a "redefine" of the keyword"otherwise". I haven't read the Haskell 98 Report but I thought that it was not possible to redefine keywords. ??
-- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/%22shadowing%22-keywords-like-%22otherwise%22-tp242391... Sent from the Haskell - Haskell-Cafe mailing list archive at Nabble.com.