5 May
2013
5 May
'13
7:45 p.m.
On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 10:46:23PM +0200, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
The case of WASH is a pity. Architecturally It was more advanced that many recent haskell web frameworks. The package would have been a success with little changes in the DSL syntax.
Could you briefly summarise the difference between WASH's approach and that of the more recent frameworks?