You might have misunderstood me.
When using hint, one wants the script to be interpreted.
It is interpreted when called " loadModules ["Script"] ", but if we call
later " interpret *something* (as :: Something) ", the *something *can be
any Haskell code, not just a function name, which means hint has also to
interpret the *something*.
So, IMO, a double interpretation is done when a function such as "getSymbol
*functionName *(as :: FuncType)", which would simply get the function, would
be sufficient.
I don't know if hint/GHC API allows to do such a thing...
2010/5/8 Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
On May 7, 2010, at 19:51 , Limestraël wrote:
then *interpret "script" (as :: ScriptFun)*
There is just the line I put in bold that bothers me. Can't we get the action "script" more easily than by re-interpreting some code?
Make up your mind: you don't want to have to compile the script, but you don't want to have to interpret the script. What exactly is supposed to be left?
-- brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd,perl,pugs,haskell] allbery@kf8nh.com system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university KF8NH