
According to this discussion, none of the corporate email is okay for
open source mailing list.
Maybe you guys should join the Vioxx lawsuit team instead of Haskell cafe.
Or maybe Haskell's strictness has trained haskell programmers to
attend such details. That is really a good training for the future of
computing :-)
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Achim Schneider
"Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH"
wrote: On Sep 25, 2008, at 13:50 , Achim Schneider wrote:
"Lihn, Steve"
wrote: Notice: This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains information of Merck & Co., Inc. (One Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station,
Just curious: What'd happen if I forward this message to alt.slack?
Technically if there's anyone on haskell-cafe who was not specifically intended to be a recipient, they are in violation of the boilerplate. (This is why lawyers who mandate such boilerplate are stupid.)
Well, you could interpret the Haskell cafe as an entity, thou this:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.haskell.cafe/45155
could prove problematic. Gmane doesn't delete.
I'm just imagining what'd happen if Merck & Co decided to sack Steve for leaking information about their stance on Haskell to the public. Think of Steve countersueing on the grounds that the boilerplate is legally effective and thus no harm is done.
-- (c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect headers for copyright history. All rights reserved. Copying, hiring, renting, performance and/or broadcasting of this signature prohibited.
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe