
26 Jul
2011
26 Jul
'11
2:46 p.m.
However, I'd be curious to know if (a) There are better or more idiomatic ways of achieving the same effect, and (b) Whether or not I should be doing this at all; It did occur to me that this seems rather trying to re-implement OOP-style inheritance with typeclasses, and therefore perhaps not a very Haskellish approach to designing
Could you give a specific example of the problem you're trying to solve?