
woops, yeah, brandon is correct.
you're fine
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Brandon Allbery
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Richard Cobbe
wrote: Question 1: How do I know this worked? I tested it by modifying a package that I'm writing so that it requires CPP to build correctly, and successfully built it with "cabal clean; cabal configure; cabal build". (More details available on request.) Does that mean I'm in good shape?
If you didn't get a compile failure after a bunch of syntax errors reported by cpp, you're good. (The problem is that clang's cpp is more pedantic about C syntax than gcc's, and doesn't appreciate being run on Haskell source. The patch adds options to disable the pedanticism.)
-- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allbery.b@gmail.com ballbery@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe