Re: [Haskell-cafe] Real World Haskell: confusion

Ah. That explains my confusion. But isn't that ambiguous terminology? There must be some reason for it to be that way? On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Eugene Kirpichov wrote:

The term 'currying' means both of these things: - Converting an uncurried function to a 'curriable' one - Partially applying a 'curriable' function

2009/1/13 Peter Verswyvelen :

...

On page 102: "partial function application is named currying"

I thought "currying" or "to curry" means converting

f :: (a,b) ->c

into

g :: a -> b -> c

by applying "curry" (mmm, are Asian people good at Haskell? :-)

g = curry f

_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe