
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 09:48 -0700, Jonathan Cast wrote:
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 18:50 +0200, Achim Schneider wrote:
Jonathan Cast
wrote: On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 18:26 +0200, Achim Schneider wrote:
Jonathan Cast
wrote: On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 13:01 -0300, Marco TĂșlio Gontijo e Silva wrote:
Op vrijdag 26-09-2008 om 11:45 uur [tijdzone -0400], schreef Stefan Monnier: > > When I compare GPL and MIT/BSD licenses, I do a simple > > reasoning. Suppose a doctor in a battle field meet a badly > > injuried enemy. Should he help the enemy? > > My answer would be that he indeed should, at the condition > that the patient will switch side. Oh wait, that's just what > the GPL says.
This is a good requisition if he is sure that he is on the right side of the battle, which is a assumption the soldier probably does, but should the doctor do it too?
Yikes. I should go create a /. thread for this to move to.
The standard practise:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triage
has enough moral compensations by itself to make you gulp.
Huh? Has that page been edited since you last looked at it? It doesn't say a thing about military practice, specifically, except that it originated *behind the French lines* in WWI, which I guess is where all those German soldiers were taken so they could be patched up and returned to their own side.
Indeed it doesn't and neither did my civil protection training, and I didn't intend to post a link containing such information.
I wasn't told anything about enemies, either, but since I'd be there in official office, not helping would not only mean risking getting sentenced on the grounds of failure to aid, but negligent homicide.
I don't know about military paramedics, but the same law should apply.
I don't trust your instincts w.r.t. `should' as applied to the military.
Nevertheless, this thread has gone *far* off-topic. It no longer has any relation to software licensing, software, or Haskell, and I will personally no longer contribute to it. I will also be deleting any further emails unread. jcc