Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Why purely in haskell?

On Jan 11, 2008 12:09 AM, wrote:

1. Indirect "black holes" that are not expressible in a strict language. You generally have to be doing something bizarre for this to occur, and it doesn't take too long before you can accurately predict when they constitute a likely risk.

What do you mean by "black hole" here? Luke