Thanks,
So you're recommending:
text (concat [a,b,c,d,e])
Might this not transform my pretty printing into ugly printing; when longer strings are used?
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: sw17ch@gmail.com on behalf of John Van Enk
Sent: Fri 15/08/2008 14:31
To: Paul Keir
Cc: haskell-cafe@haskell.org
Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Pretty Print, text or ++?
Paul,
Something tells me you might want to look at `concat':
concat :: [[a]] -> [a]
/jve
2008/8/15 Paul Keir
Hi there,
I'm writing a pretty printer using the Text.PrettyPrint library, and there's a pattern I'm coming across quite often. Does anyone know whether,
text (a ++ b ++ c ++ d) or text a <+> text b <+> text c <+> text d
runs quicker?
Cheers, Paul
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
-- /jve