Re: [Haskell-cafe] Are there standard idioms for lazy, pure error handling?

4 Dec 2009

      wren ng thornton wrote:
...
concat1 :: T a b -> (b -> T a b) -> T a b
This could just as easily be

  concat :: T a b -> (b -> T a c) -> T a c

right? It's a little weird to call this concatenation, but I bet it
could come in handy.

-- 
Jason McCarty 