Laurent Deniau wrote:
And you still need to think about where you have to introduce delays to avoid infinite loops? I don't see why, unless you want to have a memory or explicitly stop
Peter Verswyvelen wrote: the time which means it's a parameter of the transition as mention above (but instantaneous transitions seems strange). So, the causality of the transitions with a discrete time should not lead to infinite loops. The time delay exists de facto. I'm currently reading "FRP, Continued". Maybe I got confused by the text on page 56, which introduces a delay (noEvent --> addOrDelCTs) to avoid an infinite loop.
Since nobody replied yet on my question about the future of (A)FRP, maybe I can ask it again here? What is the future for FRP? Are other approaches better suitable for reactive applications?
I missed your question, but it's an interesting question. I found very interesting and instructive the paper of Hai Liu and Paul Hudak on the problem of space leaks in FRP.
Yes that is a very interesting paper, but since I'm still trying to understand and use Yampa, I will have to re-read the paper. It would be nice if Paul Hudak wrote a "Haskell HIGH School of Expression" book, explaining Yampa, because I really enjoyed the SOE book.