Re: [Haskell-cafe] Extending the idea of a general Num to other types?

On Sun, 2 Sep 2007, Lennart Augustsson wrote:

You're right. The list syntax is only for lists in Haskell. It would be nice if the list syntax was overloaded too.

The special list syntax isn't as good, as always proposed. I have collected some advantages of the bare infix notation: http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/List_notation