
On 2 July 2012 22:17, Austin Seipp
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
wrote: If you've taken over maintainership, should we remove it from haskell-pkg-janitors?
I haven't removed it from haskell-pkg-janitors because I haven't made a release and the current package points there as the homepage and source repository. My intentions were to remove the original repository (as I'm a member of the github group) once a release was made.
(I would also appreciate having my copyright being listed in https://github.com/thoughtpolice/vacuum/blob/master/pkgs/graphviz/src/GHC/Va... as that looks suspiciously like my code [1,2]).
I've pushed a commit to fix this. I'm very sorry - I imagine I was copy-pasting module-header boilerplate across the source tree to get some decent haddock results, and forgot about that (I also put the code for vacuum-graphviz up as LGPLv3 to match Vacuum's license even though I prefer BSD. Perhaps this should be changed as well, if you're not opposed.)
I'm OK with BSD for this. And I understand that copy-pasting boilerplate could mess things up ;-) There is a 2999.13.* series of graphviz out, I haven't actually tested this but I think for the limited part of the API that gets used it remains the same. When you get around to updating vacuum-cairo, it should then also dep on vacuum-graphviz and use customise vacuumParams if need be and then a custom call to graphToDotParams (that was the point of why I wrote the graphviz usage like that; Don copied a lot of the old Dot usage out just to be able to customise the attributes).
I'll probably make a release later today after doing a glance over the source tree and adding attributions I otherwise forgot (including Conrad's work.)
Well, you should probably mention Matt Morrow in Authors.txt ... ;-) (and the only thing I did was remove the old manual Dot manipulation, so it could be argued that my name isn't as important in there).
-- Regards, Austin
-- Ivan Lazar Miljenovic Ivan.Miljenovic@gmail.com http://IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com