Re: [Haskell-cafe] "Assignment" in do blocks?

On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 03:55:15PM +0300, Oleg Grenrus wrote:

It’s not re-assigment, it’s rather feature request for non-rec-let (as let in Haskell is recursive) and some pragma to say “yes, I do shadow name on purpose"

Ah, I see. Still I feel that, as much as it is easily rewriteable to a `lambda (etc etc` (which will shadow the first `a`) (let ((a 10) (a 5)) (a)) will bite you back as the val-exprs list grows.