21 Nov
2005
21 Nov
'05
10:04 a.m.
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, David Roundy wrote:
(b) Create some sort of class that allows getter and/or setter functions for field access.
(a) involves the creation of a non-function syntax for something that is essentially a function--and means you'll need boiler-plate code if you want to create accessor functions. (b) means a proliferation of classes, which is perhaps more problematic, but you gain more from it
I'm not sure it's all that bad if we can avoid namespace pollution? -- flippa@flippac.org Performance anxiety leads to premature optimisation