---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Chaddaï Fouché
I looked, I didn't find anything interesting.
Well maybe you should look one more time with your brain on... Your claim that :
Last I heard, Maple is simply another fast number-chrunking engine.
Show that you never even bothered to read the feature list of the software ! http://www.maplesoft.com/products/Maple11/academic/index.aspx?D=3040 I tried both Mathematica and Maple and while I'll be the first to admit the Mathematica interface was more attractive, it's the only obvious point I concede to it (and my version of Maple was quite old so this might not even be true anymore). As others who knows the subject have said, Mathematica and Maple are quite close and outperforms each other regularly in their fields of excellence. -- Jedaï