
8 Sep
2015
8 Sep
'15
8:27 a.m.
On 07.09.2015 22:18, Silvio Frischknecht wrote:
Looking at the nitpick list, I just remembered that there was a discussion about making let optional in do bindings a couple of years ago.
https://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2012-August/102741.html
One of the major stumbling points was how recursive bindings should work. These these two proposals would combine nicely.
adding a statement
pat = exp
that expresses a non-recursive let.
Exactly! +1 from me. -- Andreas Abel <>< Du bist der geliebte Mensch. Department of Computer Science and Engineering Chalmers and Gothenburg University, Sweden andreas.abel@gu.se http://www2.tcs.ifi.lmu.de/~abel/