derek.a.elkins:
On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 16:48 -0500, Dan Licata wrote:
Not to start a flame war or religious debate, but I don't think that eta-expansions should be considered bad style. I realize that composition-style is good for certain types of reasoning, but fully eta-expanded code has an important legibility advantage: you can tell the shape of its type just by looking at it! Personally, I'd rather read the original version.
Clearly you don't hang out on #haskell enough and have missed the humor.
For those not following, the last thing one does before comitting any Haskell code, once you've been on #haskell, is to feed it to lambdabot for "improvement" :) dons> @pl \f g (a,b) -> (f a, g b) lambdabot> flip flip snd . (ap .) . flip flip fst . ((.) .) . flip . (((.) . (,)) .) Ah, much better. We have a strange culture. -- Don