24 May
2001
24 May
'01
5:06 p.m.
Peter Douglass writes: : | but in ( foo ( bar (baz x) ) ) | | You would want the following I think. | | foo . bar . baz x | | which does have the parens omitted, but requires the composition | operator. Almost. To preserve the meaning, the composition syntax would need to be (foo . bar . baz) x or foo . bar . baz $ x or something along those lines. I favour the one with parens around the dotty part, and tend to use $ only when a closing paren is threatening to disappear over the horizon. do ... return $ case ... of ... -- many lines Regards, Tom