11 Feb
2009
11 Feb
'09
9:38 p.m.
On 12 Feb 2009, at 1:40 am, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 11. Februar 2009 00:46 schrieben Sie:
I suppose I should point out what seems obvious to me, which is that one could embed a substantial chunk of MathML (possibly all of it) in TeX. I mean, give it a TeX-parseable syntax.
You can convert MathML into TeX but not the other way round. How would you translate $a \odot b \otimes c$? It depends on the precedence of the operators.
And the point of that is? What I suggested is the way around that works. And the point of my suggestion was that one could have something that could be embedded directly in a (La)TeX document *or* processed by Haddock: no changes when copying from one document to another means fewer new mistakes.