17 May
2007
17 May
'07
3:29 a.m.
| > But then GHC would be faster then JHC! (Nobody cares about jhc, | > certainly not enough to implement a recognizer for it...) | | Ah, but think of how much faster jhc development would be if it didn't | take ghc 20 minutes to compile it every time I made a change :) Oh! A cruel jibe! Simon (Methinks I must attempt to recruit one J Meacham to GHC optimisation duties.)