
28 Oct
2012
28 Oct
'12
3:06 p.m.
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 03:53:04PM +0100, Petr P wrote:
2012/10/28 Iustin Pop
: On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 01:38:46PM +0100, Petr P wrote:
does cabal need to do any authenticated stuff? For downloading packages I think HTTP is perfectly fine. So we could have HTTP for cabal download only and HTTPS for everything else.
Kindly disagree here. Ensuring that packages are downloaded safely/correctly without MITM attacks is also important. Even if as an option.
Good point. But if cabal+https is a problem, this could be solved by other means too, for example by signing the packages.
Well, I agree, but then the same could be applied on upload too, like Debian does - instead of user+pw, register a GPG key. iustin