30 Sep
2006
30 Sep
'06
2:02 a.m.
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 06:53:35PM -0700, Chad Scherrer wrote:
Tamas,
You might want to read Joachim's post more carefully - he's trying to help you, and I think he makes a good point.
Chad, If his point is that there is no smallest positive number, then I think I understand it, thanks. I should have said that I was looking for the smallest positive number Double can represent, but thought that was clear from the context. If this is not his point, I'd really appreciate an explanation. Thanks, Tamas