15 Nov
2015
15 Nov
'15
8:55 a.m.
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 08:10:47PM +0000, Mike Meyer wrote:
Since we're talking about this, ones is the reasons I dislike for is that it treats the project history just like any other prolix public document, providing tools for modifying it, changing it as you push or pull, etc. I disagree with this, and prefer tools that believe that history should be immutable, like hg and fossil.
Which side, if either, of this does darcs land on?
darcs has some tools to "rebase". I would say they are seldom used in a typical workflow (for sure less than what I saw in typical git usage), but they are there.