Re: [Haskell-cafe] Is 'flip' really necessary?

On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Edward Z. Yang wrote:

An interesting alternate spin on flip is infix notation combined with partial application, such as:

   (`foobar` 3)

which is equivalent to

   \x -> foobar x 3

I frequently use this, although the jury's out on whether or not it's more readable.

I had HLint suggest me this : before : listeEtagTot = concatMap (flip listeEtagArm cfgTypesTringle) listeArmOrd after : listeEtagTot = concatMap (`listeEtagArm` cfgTypesTringle) listeArmOrd David.