Henning Thielemann:
ajb@spamcop.net wrote:
Quoting jerzy.karczmarczuk@info.unicaen.fr:
... tell me please: How many COBOL programs have you written in your life?
As you well know, only one COBOL program has ever been written. The rest are just modifications of it.
Actually, a more interesting problem is what you'd replace COBOL with, and how you'd go about it. Wouldn't it be nice if there was a modern language that you could write or rewrite new parts of your COBOL application in, and it all worked seamlessly with what you already had?
Do you think of something like ABAP?
A nice mixture of Cobol, SQL, a Report Writer language... Gents, we can continue for years, not knowing where we are going with this discussion. I must say that I got a little nervous. Two days of speculation on what this awful GHC has been bootstrapped from, as if the fellows who *did it* couldn't be asked directly! They read this list, and laugh... Then a ha_ha_ha over the the corpse of Cobol. OK, perhaps not a corpse... Plenty of people, and some companies, like Fujitsu, still predict a bright future for this language. God bless them. Obviously, a primitive, hierarchic database approach to programming is something very far from compilation issues. But, frankly, if you permit a serious remark: I think that there will be a serious breakthrough in the Haskell popularity in the Great World, when Haskell is applied to the construction of a fabulous, optimized ... ... COBOL compiler. Or Fortran, or SQL, or Basic. Or whatever, all *BUT* Haskell. == I have an anecdote for you. Real one. (An anecdote is *not* a joke). During my studies we had to make a small plastic box for some electronic circuit (it was hundred years ago, don't forget...) We bought some pieces of something related to polymethyl methacrylate (for profans: plexiglas, acrylite, whatever). Awful stuff. Too brittle! But, but, we found for it a fabulous usage! When dissolved in some solvent manufactured from ether + acetone + some other tasty beverage, it transformed into a viscous substance which was a *wonderful*, ideal glue, for gluing these damn pieces together. So, the lesson we learnt was the following: we got a substance whose main application was to make out of it a glue to glue itself. Since the boss of the Lab would not appreciate the high level philosophical issue related to our observation, we had to find some other usage of this glue, so we glued his chair to the floor. After this hundred years they still look for the culprit. Jerzy Karczmarczuk