7 Aug
2008
7 Aug
'08
3:13 a.m.
On Wed, 6 Aug 2008, Galchin, Vasili wrote:
1) Is there a common assumed semantics across all of the Haskell "with" things? withString? withData?
2) If the answer to 1) is yes, then does this imply some kind of polymorphism? Couldn't "with" be "reduced" to a higher order function then ??
The Continuation monad abstracts the idea of 'with': http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2008-February/038963.html