
Hrm... my example also makes ghc flub too I think... (its been a long day).
is there anything implicitly going on behind this behavior that couldn't be
resolved by eg having the reasonable heuristic that for a module named *(Prefix
...).Name* in file *Name*, any import of the form* (Prefix ...).Blah* that
isn't a registered module should be searched for relative to the directory
containing the file *Name*? Ie, given a module A.B in directory A, the
prefix would be A, and thus we are looking for a module B.C relative to the
offset of Directory A/. This doesn't seem to be create any ambiguity, it
just more intelligently uses explicitly available in the source
information.
I don't think that semantics creates the sort of ambiguity that Kevin is
concerned about, and while yes there simple alternative approaches, they
require whatever is starting up ghci to know what the correct directory to
pass to the -i flag, and that seems a bit of a heavy weight expectation for
anything that can't apriori parse haskell modules (which would seem ironic
considering such tools typically use ghc's libraries for that task!)
*
*
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 3:22 AM, Kevin Quick
On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 22:45:57 -0700, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic < ivan.miljenovic@gmail.com> wrote:
Carter Schonwald
writes: Hello All, I'm not sure if this either a bug in how ghc does path/module
lookup or it simply is invalid haskell:
consider modules A, A.B and A.B.C where A imports A.B, and A.B imports A.B.C with the following file system layout
A.hs A/B.hs A/B/C.hs
minimal file examples: module A where import A.B testA = "will it really really work? ------------ module A.B where import A.B.C testB = "will it work ----------------- module A.B.C where testC = "will this work?" ---------- if i run ghci A.hs everything's fine but if in directory B i rune ghci B.hs, i get A/B.hs:2:8: Could not find module `A.B.C': Use -v to see a list of the files searched for.
----------- it seems to me that if the default search path for ghc(i) includes the current directory (which according to docs it does), this shouldn't be happening. (or is there some why this is good Behavior?)
I think ghci is just not smart enough to know that it should change to the parent directory and run it from there. As such, it's trying to find "A.B.C" from the context of the current directory, and the file is not in A/A/B/C.hs so it can't find it.
So it's just a limitation of ghci (I think).
I'm afraid I disagree and would view this as expected behavior.
"import A.B.C" translates internally to something like load_file_using_paths("A/B/C.hs").
When you are running this from the top level directory (e.g. "top"), ghci includes the current path "top" so the lookup is for "top/A/B/C.hs", which clearly exists.
When you are in directory B, ghci includes the current path "top/A/B" so the lookup is for "top/A/B/A/B/C.hs"... which does not exist, thus your error.
Your example would require ghci to try load_file_using_paths("B/C.hs") (and then load_file_using_paths("C.hs") to be complete), which discards the directory heirarchy specified by the module nomenclature. This is not adviseable because it introduces ambiguities. For example, if you also had a C.hs in A and another C.hs in A/B, which C.hs should it load when you say "import A.B.C"? Or "import C"? If ghc/ghci discarded paths, then the results would be either (1) a different C.hs depending on your current directory, (2) the bottom-most C.hs, (3) the C.hs in the current directory, (4) random?. Worse, any of the above results in a trojan-horse style security hole. Also, what if there was a C.hs in the directory above you (top/..)? A 1:1 mapping between module heirarchy specification and directory paths is the only dependable mechanism.
The better solution is to specifically set the paths you expect to form the roots of the (non-default) module heirarchy if you plan to work from within subdirectories of your source tree. If you invoked ghci as "$ ghci -i /path/to/top" then it would work regardless of your current directory. I believe that this is the proper solution to http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/3140 as well.
-KQ
-- -KQ