Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Is "take" behaving correctly?

Jules Bean wrote:

I'm not delighted with the idea of replacing our concise elegant standard library names with uglyAndRatherLongCamelCaseNamesThatCouldBePerlOrEvenJava though. Conciseness of expression is a virtue.

I, on the other hand, I'm not delighted with names such as "Eq" and "Ord". (Would it be *so* hard to write "Equal" and "Ordered"?) This is one of the main things I'd have done differently if I'd designed Haskell... not that anybody is too bothered. ;-)