I was playing with QuickCheck and I just wanted to put all of my tests in a list, but that's not possible, because of the fact that a list can only contain values of the same type. So concrete I would like to write down this: prop_RevRev xs = reverse (reverse xs) == xs where types = xs::[Int] --trivial test prop_Simple = True == True whatIwant::(Testable a)=>[a] whatIwant = [prop_RevRev, prop_Simple] testAll::IO () testAll = do sequence_ $ map quickCheck whatIwant quickCheck can work on all Testable values, so why can't a list (any datastructure) can't hold Testable values? What this gives you is, a lot more flexibility. Just like you can define your functions on interfaces, now you can use interfaces in your datastructures. I can't think of any reason why it couldn't be implemented in any Haskell compiler. I saw this page: http://www.haskell.org/hawiki/ExistentialTypes but you still have to explicitly add the relation via Obj (and that's bad). Regards, Ron P.S. If it already exist in this exact way, how is it called? _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Express yourself with Y! Messenger! Free. Download now. http://messenger.yahoo.com