Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Thinking about what's missing in our library coverage

...

...

...

...

"Tom" == Tom Tobin writes:

Tom> As I understand it, Pandoc is entirely under the GPL (not Tom> LGPL). I'd be very wary of accepting a GPL'd library as a I'd be very upset if pandoc weren't blessed. Tom> blessed "standard" library, since it would be completely Tom> unusable for non-GPL projects. This can surely be tackled by cabal, as it already has the license information. So if you were to specify you project has a BSD license, and it requires use of a library licensed under the GPL, then cabal configure should fail with an error message. Just because a library is blessed, doesn't mean you have to use it. -- Colin Adams Preston Lancashire