On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 03:41:36PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote:
I stumbled across the SPDX (https://spdx.org/). Possibly the hackage license list should be expanded to incorporate this in some way? Or at least the OSI-approved entries?
Hackage admin decided to go for the 'soft' (as no-list) approach [1]. Relevant quote: " The hackage operators do not want to be in the business of making judgements on what is and is not a valid open source license, but we retain the right to remove packages that are not under licenses that are open source in spirit, or that conflict with our ability to operate this service. (If you want advice, see the ones Cabal recommends.) But I am willing to write the necessary bits to add relevant and used free/open-source licences which are now missing from cabal. Today I was talking with dcoutts on freenode/#hackage and he made me realise that, apart from licence coverage, there is a problem with dual licences. This has to be addressed, otherwise we will never manage to 'tame' the Licence datatype (which would be quite important to, e.g. to autocheck whether licence dependencies are satisfied). [1] https://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2015-March/118526.html