
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Alexander Dunlap
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 4:00 AM, Michael Snoyman
wrote: On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Tim Matthews
wrote: On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Michael Snoyman
wrote: Quick update: I'm including the "Stylish" code in the hamlet package now, and renaming it to "Camlet" (CSS-hamlet). I'm also including something called "Jamlet", which doesn't do much besides variable interpolation. As you might guess, it's for Javascript. I mention it at the end of my most recent blog post[1]. Michael
While It's just a name and not really important: hamlet was haml so I first imagined sasset, sasslet or another name from one of the works of Shakespeare but I then really liked stylish as I thought it would tell that something with solid foundations and theory could still appear, hip and pretty.
What is important though is the code. This is absolutely great and success just keeps getting harder to avoid.
This is by no means a final decision; I'm open to being convinced that other names are better. But I'll point out the main reason for the Camlet/Jamlet name choice: easy to remember and type. I found "stylish" to be much harder to get out than "camlet"; that might just be because I'm so used to hamlet already, but that's exactly my goal here: make these three templating systems work together nicely to make the developers life a little bit easier. Michael _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
CaSSius and JSaesar?
I'd rather go with Julius at that point.
Alex _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
-- Work is punishment for failing to procrastinate effectively.