25 Feb
2013
25 Feb
'13
11:21 a.m.
On 25 Feb 2013, at 11:14, Oliver Charles wrote:
Obvious question: How does this compare to cassava? Especially cassava's Data.CSV.Incremental module? I specifically ask because you mention that it's " It is lazier, faster, more space-efficient, and more flexible in its treatment of errors, than any other extant Haskell CSV library on Hackage" but there is no mention of cassava in the website.
Simple answer - I have never heard of cassava, and suspect it did not exist when I first did the benchmarking. I'd be happy to re-do my performance comparison, including cassava and any other recent-ish CSV libraries, if I can find them. Regards, Malcolm