
4 May
2011
4 May
'11
2:56 a.m.
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 23:14, Daniel Fischer
did you notice that the comment says 128KB strings for ps and lps, but they are in fact 1MB strings:
-- 128KB strings ps = B.replicate (2^20) 0 lps = L.replicate (2^20) 0
? If not, the throughput would look much better, wouldn't it?
Ah, I failed to mention this in my previous mail. I changed the test values from 128KB to 1MB to see if it would help the throughput (by lowering overhead in the framework). So I've already compensated for this in the MB/s calculations. Nice catch, though :-) -- Johan Brinch