12 Nov
2009
12 Nov
'09
3:24 a.m.
Hello David, Thursday, November 12, 2009, 10:22:41 AM, you wrote:
are you seen hugs, for example? i think that ghc is slow because it's written in haskell and compiled by itself
If I understood, Evan is interested in ideas to speed up compilation. As far as I know, hugs is an interpreter, not a compiler.
it's impossible to interpret haskell - how can you do type inference? hugs, like ghci, is bytecode interpreter. the difference is their implementation languages - haskell vs C -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin@gmail.com