5 Dec
2008
5 Dec
'08
5:54 p.m.
Hi, Am Freitag, den 05.12.2008, 23:43 +0100 schrieb Henning Thielemann:
ryani$ ghci foldlr.hs [...] Prelude FoldLR> :set +s Prelude FoldLR> test (1000000,'a') (0.39 secs, 70852332 bytes) Prelude FoldLR> testNaive (1000000,'a') (0.42 secs, 105383824 bytes)
There is still no clear advantage of foldl'r compared to foldl'rNaive, is it?
Maybe not directly speed-wise, but the memory consumption is reduced by 30% (probably due to laziness, and unless I misreading ghci’s output) Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner mail: mail@joachim-breitner.de | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Key: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://www.joachim-breitner.de/ Debian Developer: nomeata@debian.org