7 Oct
2004
7 Oct
'04
7:13 a.m.
Peter Simons
Keith Wansbrough writes:
Count me as a vote for the better-but-slightly-slower wc.
How about the attached program? On my machine it faster than Tomasz's version, and I think it's still a fairly clean source code
I guess it's possible to submit three different Haskell entries (for GHC, Hugs and NHC). Perhaps we should split up, and aim for performance with GHC, memory with NHC and clarity/brevity with Hugs? (Seriously, it would be very instructive to look at the differences between the three versions.) -kzm -- If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants