
My understanding is that blocking/redirection is to be done at the DNS
level. In which case, there *is* a "?banner" hack of sorts - get the
IP by some other means.
Which is not to say we should be significantly less concerned.
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Brandon Allbery
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 13:11, Henning Thielemann
wrote: On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Andrew Butterfield wrote:
Just add ?banner=none to the url if you really have to read the page
Maybe the intention was to demonstrate that censorship (in this case self-censorship) is mostly a problem for average users but not for advanced users.
There isn't going to be a disable-javascript or ?banner hack when anyone anywhere can force a website to be redirected to some DOJ page without providing any proof. (Yes, really.)
-- brandon s allbery allbery.b@gmail.com wandering unix systems administrator (available) (412) 475-9364 vm/sms
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe