Re: [Haskell-cafe] What is the consensus about -fwarn-unused-do-bind ?

(before anyone tells me I should be using an Applicative style instead, polyparse doesn't support Applicative, so I can't)

Well, polyparse may not support the Applicative class defined in Control.Applicative, but it _does_ have an applicative interface using other names for the same operators (namely, pure == return, (<*>) == apply, (<*) == discard, (<|>) = onFail).

2. Use some function of type "(Monad m) => m a -> m ()" instead of doing "_ <-".

This function was discussed on the libraries list in the last year or so. I think the consensus name for it was "void". Of your 4 alternatives, I quite like this one. Regards, Malcolm