Re: [Haskell-cafe] If you'd design a Haskell-like language, what would you do different?

On Tue, 2011-12-20 at 16:53 -0500, Matthew Farkas-Dyck wrote:

Two of three ain't bad (^_~)

Now we just need λ to replace \, → to replace ->, and ≠ to replace /= (which still looks like division assignment no matter how hard I squint my eyes. 25 years of C and C derived languages is hard to forget). Hey, forget replacing, wouldn't it be wonderful if the compiler would just accept them as synonyms? AfC Sydney