Yeah. I wanted to propose that as well, but I don't really know how well that scales to larger patterns. On Nov 5, 2009, at 4:42 PM, Sjoerd Visscher wrote:
Let's add point free pattern matching too then:
myFunc = anotherFunc $ case of Left -> print Right -> putStrLn
Sjoerd
On Nov 5, 2009, at 4:09 PM, Sebastiaan Visser wrote:
Hello all,
Wouldn't it be nice if we could write point free case statements?
I regularly find myself writing down something like this:
myFunc = anotherFunc $ \x -> case x of Left err -> print err Right msg -> putStrLn msg
We could really use a case statement in which we skip the scrutinee and make `(case of {})' be syntactic sugar for `(\x -> case x of {})'.
So we could write:
myFunc = anotherFunc $ case of Left err -> print err Right msg -> putStrLn msg
A minor syntactical addition, a big win!
Cheers,
-- Sebastiaan Visser