John Goerzen
About Text.ParserCombinators.Parsec.RFC2234 and the like. ... ... you do not in fact define any new combinators for parsing. What you have there is a parser
This module provides parsers for the grammar defined in RFC2234,
alpha :: CharParser st Char bit :: CharParser st Char character :: CharParser st Char cr :: CharParser st Char
Yes, I do see the point that these are rather generic and basic parsers. (But they are not combinators as such, just alternative "primitives" of the domain-specific parsing language.) I guess they could easily live with Parsec after all, unless there is an obviously better place for them in the hierarchy.
Does the above suggest a single good place for them to you?
You mean, for the constructed parsers, as well as the basics? I suppose I would go for much the same suggestions as before, apart from RFC2234: Text.ParserCombinators.Parsec.RFC2234 Network.SMTP.RFC2821.Parse Network.Email.RFC2822.Parse Conceivably, you might want to drop the RFC part of the latter two names, and merely refer users to the relevant RFC in the Haddock docs? Network.SMTP.Parse Network.Email.Parse Regards, Malcolm